A blog on sports ... and maybe more

Category: Chicago sports

A Letter to DeMar DeRozan

Dear DeMar DeRozan:

I am writing to thank you, and to apologize.

First, thank you for saving New Year’s Eve with that ridiculous, last-second, hop-off-one-foot floater from 25 feet that beat the Pacers. The college football semifinals turned out to be yawners. Alabama blows out Cincinnati; Georgia blows out Michigan. The SEC asserts its dominance again. Ho hum. Thankfully, the late-afternoon start to the Bulls’ game gave me an off-ramp from watching college football.

You kind of struggled most of the game, to be fair. But you had the ball in your hands, down by one point, at the end of the game. The obvious play was to drive to your favorite spot at the elbow and either take a 15-footer or kick to Coby White on the wing. But you dribbled near mid-court, seemingly oblivious that the last few seconds of the game were ticking away. But then — finally — you made your move. Dribble, dribble, crossover dribble, hop off your left leg, launch, swish. Winner. I just saw a headline that called your shot “The New Year’s Eve Heave.” I wish I’d come up with that line. On the TV broadcast, Bulls announcer Adam Amin had a wonderful call: “DeMAR! DeROZAN! DeLIVERS!” I only wish Stacey King had made the trip to Indy to call the game — or maybe not. I don’t know that his heart could have survived that finish. So thank you, again, DeMar, for sending out 2021 with a bang. Here’s the shot to beat the Pacers.

Second, thank you for that cool, alliterative name. It just rolls off the tongue. Kudos to your mom, or whomever put that thing of beauty together.

Third, thank you for doing something that has never been done before — hitting a game-winning buzzer-beater two days in a row. (I know, Larry Bird did it in back-to-back games, but he had a day off in between those games.) The pump-fake-first-launch-three pointer from the corner against the Wizards on New Year’s Day made me shout, to no one in particular: You have to be [expletive] kidding me! But you don’t kid, DeMar. You just do DeMar stuff. Here’s the shot to beat the Wizards. Adam Amin Act II: “DeMAR! DeLIVERS! AGAIN!” Good call. (What did announcers Amin and Robbie Hummel do to deserve those two finishes, by the way?) So thank you again, DeMar, for starting off 2022 with a bang.

Finally, thank you for the 26.8 points, 5.0 rebounds, and 4.6 assists you are averaging this year (before Saturday’s game). Somebody recently whispered that you might be a league MVP candidate. We’ll see, but it’s not crazy talk. Your team is 24-10, leads the Eastern Conference, and is — maybe above all else — really, really fun to watch. And don’t let the haters tell you that you and the guys are fattening up on COVID-depleted teams. You and every single one of your teammates has missed time due to COVID, and your win yesterday came without Lonzo Ball and Alex Caruso, your team’s best defenders. Stack wins, that’s your job. And the stack is seven wins high, at the moment.

DeMar and Zach

Now, for the apology.

I did not immediately believe. When the Bulls announced they had acquired you this past offseason, I did not quite know what to think. As more than a casual basketball fan, I knew who you were, of course. I mean, you have averaged more than 20 points over the course of a long career. Your record speaks for itself. But to be fair, you are 32 years old. And it wasn’t exactly clear to me how you fit with Zach Lavine, the incumbent alpha Bull. You are 6-feet-6, Zach is 6-5. And then the Bulls picked up Lonzo Ball, who is 6-6. And Alex Caruso, who is 6-5.  And Javonte Green, who is 6-5. And Derrick Jones Jr., who is 6-6.

I should have believed, because your bosses seem like they know what they are doing. You weren’t around, but for most recent years the Bulls sort of wallowed in mediocrity under the leadership of John Paxson and Gar Forman — not-so-affectionately known as GarPax. Pax ascended from clutch shooter during the Bulls first three-peat in the early 1990s to the team’s basketball honcho. Gar ascended to GM from being a scout or assistant trainer or Luv-a-Bulls choreographer or something — he was always a little under the radar. Many years ago, GarPax assembled a legitimate championship-caliber team thanks to ping pong balls bouncing wildly in their favor in the NBA draft lottery, allowing the Bulls to draft hometown hero Derrick Rose with the first overall pick. And, to their credit, GarPax hired an actual competent NBA coach in Tom Thibodeau at one point, and he brought a certain identity to the team under which it thrived for a time. GarPax also had a knack for drafting guys who exceeded or at least met expectations to become very solid NBA players, or better — guys like Jimmy Butler, Taj Gibson, Joakim Noah, and Luol Deng.

But before handing over the reins to New Management in April 2020, GarPax had run its course, like a stubborn, too-long-lingering common cold. After injuries derailed the destiny of the Rose/Thibodeau Bulls, GarPax did weird stuff – maybe none weirder than paying an over-the-hill Dwyane Wade a gym full of money to play with Jimmy Butler and Rajon Rondo during the infamous, short-lived Three Alpha Era of Bulls history. That didn’t go so well. So GarPax blew things up, traded Butler for guys and draft picks, one of whom was Lavine. GarPax was really good at acquiring pieces, but not so good at fitting those pieces together. It seemed like the last five years of the GarPax Era was all about collecting pieces that formed teams that never approached being as good as the sum of those pieces. Otto Porter, Wendell Carter, Lauri Markkanen, Kris Dunn. Nice players, but collectively mostly a mess. And it didn’t help, of course, that Jim Boylan, Vinny Del Negro, Fred Hoiberg, and Jim Boylen were the coaches that preceded and followed Thibodeau. I mean — can you believe it, DeMar? A Jim Boylan and a Jim Boylen. And neither of them could coach a lick.

Look, the Bulls have an actual NBA-caliber head coach again!

I should have believed in you, DeMar, because New Management – basketball operations chief Arturas Karnisovas and GM Marc Eversley – went out in September 2020 and hired an actual, bona fide NBA coach in Billy Donovan, a pretty good sign that they knew what the hell they were doing. The AK-Eversley-Donovan trio tinkered last year, when the games were played at local YMCAs without fans, if I recall correctly. They acquired big man Nikola Vucevic from Orlando in a mid-season trade. Hmmm. An actual All-Star center. I thought, this is interesting. But I wasn’t sure how Vucevic fit, exactly. He’s another good piece — but clearly he and Lavine were not enough. As a Bulls fan, the GarPax Era left me skeptical — call it PGPSD, Post-GarPax Stress Disorder. It certainly wasn’t obvious to me that Lavine-Vucevic could elevate the Bulls from also-ran to contender.

Well, it turned out I was right, Vucevic was just another piece. But New Management had a plan to build around the talents of Vucevic and Lavine, without pretending Vucevic and Lavine were some sort of Big Two that could carry the team over the top. This Big Two needed help; in fact, this Big Two needed to become part of a Big Three or Big Four. That’s where you came in, DeMar. New Management acquired you and Lonzo — guys who would not necessarily defer to Vucevic and Lavine, but might actually make them more effective by reducing the need for them to carry too much load. New Management seems to value guys who will guard the perimeter on defense and can score on all three offensive levels. The team reminds me a lot of my favorite college basketball team of all time – the 1988-89 Flying Illini squad that lost to Michigan in the Final Four. That team, like your team, was relentlessly athletic. Every guy was basically the same length – within an inch or two, from point guard to center. The Illini didn’t have anyone comparable to Vucevic, but it had a bunch of versatile, bouncy, athletic guys who loved to play basketball and did it really well together.

I’m sorry, DeMar, because I didn’t realize you were the key to this whole thing. The knock against you was that you took too many difficult, mid-range, two-point shots in an era when analytics say shoot layups, dunks, and threes, and nothing more. But you have that old school mid-range game, you distribute, you rebound, and you get to the free throw line.

What I love about your game is that I imagine it was forged not just in gyms at AAU tournaments, but on the blacktops of Compton, California, where you grew up. “Playground basketball” has a negative connotation, to some. But to me, playground basketball doesn’t mean needlessly fancy passes and one-on-one play. Playground basketball is about toughness; it’s about driving to the rim, absorbing contact, and still getting a shot off — with no ref nearby to blow a whistle. It means getting your shot blocked back in your face, getting the ball back, collecting yourself, and going right back at the guy who blocked it. You are a playground baller, DeMar. I am embarrassed I did not believe in you.

I’ll admit this: I cursed you when you took a crappy shot at the end of the game against the Knicks in the Bulls first loss, early in the season. I thought, “shouldn’t that have been Zach’s shot?” But I realize now you were marking your territory, and it didn’t really matter if that shot fell or not. You missed it, but left no doubt you’d keep taking that shot, if needed. That Zach was not alone any more. You’ve convinced me, DeMar. The Bulls have two guys capable of taking control of fourth quarters, and two guys capable of closing games. You are not afraid to take big shots, and not too proud to let Zach do it. Forgive me for doubting you, DeMar.

Let’s get on with the rest of the season, now that the whole damn Bulls roster — and Donovan — have taken their turns in quarantine. I am interested to see whether a team can contend for the NBA championship without two or three no-doubt Hall-of-Fame caliber guys. There is no Steph Curry here, no Lebron, no Kevin Durant, no Greek Freak. But color me intrigued by what your bosses have put together – a team that seems to be more than the sum of its parts. Very, very intrigued.

Let me finish by saying Happy New Year, DeMar. And, belatedly, welcome to Chicago. I don’t know how long this will last, but for the time being, Da Bulls have become De Bulls.

Your pal,

DePaul

Buzz. Killed.

In my personal sports fan bubble, this past weekend was hard to top.

Starting Friday night and through Sunday, nothing went wrong:

  • The Chicago Cubs swept the Pittsburgh Pirates, taking firm hold of first place in the NL Central.
  • The Chicago White Sox swept the Kansas City Royals, bouncing back from a shaky start to the season and showing much-anticipated signs of promise.
  • The Chicago Blackhawks returned to the ice and took a 1-0 lead in their series against the Edmonton Oilers, riding Actual Youth and the Fountain of  Youth to a surprisingly impressive 6-4 win.
  • Finally, two Illinois basketball players who were flirting with the NBA – guard Ayo Dosunmo (the Illini’s best player) and center Kofi Cockburn (the reigning Big Ten Freshman of the Year) – announced they were returning for their junior and sophomore seasons, respectively. Instantly, Illinois was a preseason Top 10 team nationally, and Illini fans were given reason to dream big again.

The Buzz

Finally – for the first time in months – I paid rapt attention to sports. I wore out my remote control flipping among the Cubs, Sox, and Blackhawks on Saturday afternoon. I shared excited one-word texts with Illini fans: “Ayo!“Kofi!” I watched post-game highlight shows to see replays of the six Hawk goals that I’d seen live. And then watched each goal again on my smartphone. I studied box scores – particularly those chronicling White Sox games. If you are not yet on that bandwagon, join. That lineup is must-watch TV, and Sox rookie centerfielder Luis Robert looks like the product of a science project to create a baseball playing machine. Imagine – if you can relate – Anthony Michael Hall’s character and his buddy in Weird Science setting out to build the ultimate baseball player, and not Kelly LeBrock.

It was all so … normal. Live sports. Lounging away a weekend afternoon. A little guilty that I wasn’t being productive, but not really. Optimism. Hope. I thought the kinds of thoughts I haven’t thought in months. Boy, David Ross seems to have these guys playing loose. How would you ever pitch around this Sox lineup? Is this the most talented Illinois hoops team since 2005? The deepest Illinois hoops team in my memory? Has Kirby Dach grown from boy to man in the last four months? Has Jonathan Toews turned back the clock? Is Dominik Kubalik the Next Big Thing? What got into Tyler Chatwood? Did Adam Engel really leave 10 men on base as a hitter in a nine-inning game? (He did.) Is that some sort of record? (Looks it up.) Nope. But close – former Cub Glenn Beckert once left 12 on base.

This. This is what I missed. Wallowing in thoughts about the games and the players and the records. Dreaming of what Luis Robert and Yoan Moncada and Eloy Jimenez could become. Thoroughly enjoyable. For me, thoroughly normal.

The Kill

But as it turned out, the sports pages offered no respite from the invisible, dark cloud that has been hovering for months – COVID-19.

Outside my little bubble, it turns out, the virus carries on, upsetting daily life in America:

  • The Miami Marlins did not play baseball at all last weekend, and neither did the Washington Nationals or the St. Louis Cardinals or the Milwaukee Brewers or the Philadelphia Phillies or the Toronto Blue Jays. Positive tests. Lost games. COVID.
  • The Rutgers football team suspended all team activities following a wave of positive tests traced to attendance at a party. College kids – left to their own good judgment – decided to cut loose and attend a party. Who could have predicted that? COVID.
  • By my rough count, nearly 60 NFL players have opted out of playing the upcoming NFL season – including a key piece of the defense for the Beloved Bear, nose tackle Eddie Goldman. COVID.
  • Rafael Nadal withdrew from the U.S. Open. COVID.

So as much buzz as the weekend could generate, COVID-19 killed it. Sure, Chicago’s MLB teams appear to be legitimate contenders. But is the sport going to make it to the finish line in 2020? Sure, Ayo and Kofi are back. But back for what? Are we going to even have a college basketball season when it’s not possible to confine college kids to a bubble and expect that there won’t be positive tests?

I cannot help thinking it was all a tease. The optimism, the hope, the anticipation. But “it’s all going to go away,” right? Right? A Tweet from ProFootballTalk’s account, of all things, summed up the situation pretty well, I think:

More than 150,000 American are dead. There are people who take the situation seriously, people who have grown numb to it, and people who continue to twist and torture the facts and logic to continue to downplay it. How many more have to die before they’ll admit they were wrong.

@Pro football talk, twitter post, august 4, 2020, 10:38 pm

What I have learned during the pandemic, I think, is that Americans – collectively – are pretty selfish. And fiercely individual. And prone to read and believe and repeat what they want to read and believe, and deny facts that inconveniently decimate their view of the world.

The optimism and hope and excitement I felt this past weekend did not have to be fleeting. But – as a nation – it looks like we blew it. We took a halfhearted approach to locking down and dealing with COVID-19 this Spring, and as a result we sit here in August, not really sure we’ve made much progress in overcoming this pandemic. Yes, we have gotten better at treating the sick. Yes, the progress toward a vaccine is encouraging. Yes, we are doing more testing now than we were doing in March and April. All good things.

But my sports fan’s buzz was killed when my thoughts drifted back to the dark cloud that is COVID-19. My buzz was killed when I scrolled through my social media accounts and continued to see debates about mask-wearing and the wisdom of doing all that testing. The thing that makes me most unsettled about the future of this country, and the present, is that a substantial number of Americans gobble up misinformation like fried food at a state fair. The ease with which people can propagate bad, unchecked, agenda-driven information has created a toxic environment in this country.

On the COVID front, the United States is, I am told, the best at testing. And yet many have to wait in hours-long lines and then wait days for results. But screw testing, others say – more testing means more positive cases. And we don’t need those! This is nonsense, of course. (If you are at all taken by the argument that the nation would be better off if we did less testing, please reach out to me privately and I’ll try to explain why doing more testing and detecting as many cases as possible is a good thing, not a bad thing, if we want to put COVID-19 in the rear view mirror.)

Put simply, we Americans have done a miserable job, collectively, at dealing with COVID. And that’s on the politicians and their constituents. We are lousy consumers of information, because we are lazy consumers of information. Just because you agree with a person or a party’s position on immigration or welfare or the corporate income tax does not mean you should lap up what that person or party feeds you about matters of public health. The rejection by some of science and scientists who have spent entire careers preparing to guide a nation through a crisis like this blows my mind.

Hindsight is 20/20. I get that. But a bunch of countries suffered like the U.S. suffered earlier this year. And they asked their citizens to sacrifice more than the U.S. asked its citizens to sacrifice – again, collectively speaking. As a result, many nations we would consider our peers (you know, if we weren’t uniquely “great”) are preparing to send their kids back to school without the fear that grips parents and educators on this side of the pond.

Interestingly, the two professional sports leagues that seem to be getting back to play without reports of cancelled games or outbreaks are the NBA and NHL. What are they doing that baseball isn’t doing, and that football won’t be able to do? The short answer: bubbles. Players are being confined, and limited from contact with the outside world. They are engaged in a collective effort, pursuant to a plan designed by league officials who consulted medical and public health experts in putting it together. No exceptions. Everyone pulling on the same rope, in the same direction – trying to keep the games going. Imagine that.

Go ahead – send me all the articles you’d like to send me, all the statistics that say I’m being too hard on the good old USA. We’ve done a terrific job, right? It will all, magically, go away? It is what it is, right? Yes, hindsight is 20/20, but foresight counts too. And it appears that many, many nations had more than we did. And they did not let a pandemic become a political football.

Statistics can be fickle. They can be spun and massaged and cherry-picked to make about any point you want to make. So I’ll just mention a few here that cannot really be spun and massaged. They are cherry-picked, I suppose, but only because they are the ones that matter most to me. If you want to cherry-pick your own, go for it –  here’s my source. As of August 5, 2020:

  • 161,601 Americans have died due to COVID-19
  • as a percentage of total population, 91 of every 1,000,000 citizens in the world have died due to COVID-19
  • as a percentage of its population, 488 of every 1,000,000 Americans have died due to COVID-19 – or more than 5x the world average
  • of the 215 nations tracked, the United States ranks as the 11th worst in deaths as a percentage of population (to be clear, being 11th is bad, not good)
  • stated another way, the United States has about 4% of the world’s population, and about 23% of the deaths due to COVID-19

For the richest, most technologically advanced nation on Earth, that’s not good. And it kills my buzz. And it does not kill my buzz any less because most of the dead were old. Or had diabetes. Or high blood pressure. They had months or years or even decades left. Many died early, and unnecessarily so.

***

As I wrote this piece, I was flipping between the Cubs and Sox games, and then added the Blackhawks Game 3 vs. Edmonton to the mix. The Cubs win – again. The Hawks improbably score two late in the third to take a 2-1 lead in the series. I wander to bed after midnight – and the buzz is back. Maybe there’s hope. Maybe the Hawks hoist another Cup and the Cubs and Sox face off in the World Series? Maybe we are really headed back to normal.

***

And then I woke up, walked the dog, and started reading. I ran across this headline and read the accompanying story: As problems mount, college football’s outlook appears grim: ‘You can feel the tidal wave coming.’

After months without sports, and tens of thousands of deaths, the tidal wave is coming? Then what just happened?

It’s time to go to work. Buzz killed.

The Last Dance’s Missed Step

Predictably, I’m hooked. Four episodes into its 10-episode run, The Last Dance on ESPN is proving to be must-watch television. Great memories. Unforgettable characters. Horace Grant’s succinct, profane summary of the Detroit Pistons’ petulant walk-off after being swept by the Bulls in the 1991 conference finals. Dennis Rodman getting the green light from Phil Jackson, mid-season, to go on a 48-hour bender in Vegas. Countless electrifying highlights of Michael Jordan in his prime. For any basketball fan – and especially a Bulls fan – this is watching sports pornography. What’s not to like?

Actually, I do have one small beef with The Last Dance, and I think those of you who are from Chicago, grew up in Chicago, or lived in Chicago at any point before or during the Jordan years will understand. So far, at least, The Last Dance has failed to capture Michael Jordan’s enormous impact on the City of Chicago’s image and its citizenry’s collective self-esteem. MJ turned out to be a six-time NBA champion, zillion-time All-Star, Olympic champion, and the greatest-of-all-time at his sport. But before he was any of those things – and while he was building his legacy – he was our superstar.

I’ve seen some quibbling, critical reviews of the series – typically from those who acknowledge Michael Jordan’s status as Basketball Jesus, cultural icon, marketing phenomenon and all that, but clearly aren’t enamored of Michael Jordan the Person. One described Jordan as a 57-year-old with a paunch who – sadly – cannot let go of decades-long grudges. (On that charge, I find him guilty, though I’m not sure it’s so sad – the paunch or the grudges.) Another remarked that the series is too wed to telling the story from Jordan’s point of view. To that, I say “What? You want to hear more from Scott Burrell and Jud Buechler?” Call me crazy, but I am far more interested in Jordan’s perspective than Luc Longley’s.

Yet another scribe suggested Jordan only agreed to allow extensive access because he saw LeBron James as a threat to his status as the GOAT. Frankly, I don’t much care why Jordan agreed to sit down for hours and hours of interviews – I’m glad he did it. If you’ve seen the excellent 30-for-30 feature on the 1985 Bears, you saw an incredibly poignant story angle focused on Buddy Ryan, the team’s defensive coordinator. By the time the cameras rolled, Ryan was a dying man who had lost the ability to communicate much at all, let alone tell stories. The love his former players had for Ryan, and the love he had for them, came screaming out of the television. But man, what I would give to hear Buddy Ryan tell stories about Hampton and Singletary and McMichael and Dent and the Fridge. So yeah – I’m fine with lots of MJ in this series, and relegating his supporting cast to supporting roles.

My Guys – Norm Van Lier, Jerry Sloan, and Bob Love

Chicago Basketball B.M. (Before Michael)

Pre-Jordan, professional basketball in Chicago was more or less a wasteland. The Chicago Bulls were actually the third NBA franchise to call Chicago home. The Stags (1946-50), Packers and Zephyrs (1961-63) had failed to stick, but the NBA awarded the city an expansion franchise in 1966. The Bulls, coached by Chicago prep and University of Illinois great Johnny “Red” Kerr, actually made the playoffs – the first time an expansion franchise had done so in its first season. The Bulls first draft pick was the legendary Dave Schellhase of Purdue, a 6-3 guard who played in 73 games for the team and scored fewer points per game (2.8) than he had functioning limbs (presumably, 4). The initial success did not last. By 1968, the city was sufficiently disinterested in the Bulls that one of their home games was contested before 891 fans, and some “home” games were played in a far western suburb – Kansas City, Missouri.

In the mid-1970s, the Bulls put together a pretty decent team, and they were the first team to break my heart and make my nine-year-old self cry. Featuring Jerry Sloan, Norm Van Lier, Chet “The Jet” Walker, and Bob “Butterbean” Love, the 1974-75 Bulls took the eventual NBA champion Golden State Warriors to seven games in the conference finals, but lost. To this day, I hate Rick Barry and his silly underhanded free throw style – the one he used to make better than 90 percent that year. I recall the sting of that loss if it happened yesterday. After the game, I retired to my room, pulled the covers over my head, and cried myself to sleep. I had been initiated into the fraternity of disappointed Chicago sports fans.

The A-Train, Artis Gilmore

That Bulls squad, coached by Dick Motta, dribbled off a cliff the next season. They went 24-58. Motta was out, and the forgettable Ed Badger replaced him. This began a dark, dark time in Bulls history. Playing mostly to empty seats at the Chicago Stadium, the Bulls teams in the eight years leading up to Jordan’s arrival in 1984 were most remembered for bad basketball and consuming copious amounts of cocaine (if The Last Dance has it right). This was my team, though. As I staggered through adolescence, I rode with the A-Train, Artis Gilmore – he of the creaky knees and gigantic Afro. The A-Train was 7-2, a bruising lefty with a blacksmith’s touch, and the best center in team history. Incredibly – given the weight of having been a Bull – he ended up in the Hall of Fame. The only reason he was a Bull at all was that the team drafted him #1 overall when the American Basketball Association folded and the NBA held a dispersal draft to claim players from the teams that were not being merged into the league. The Kentucky Colonels’ loss turned out to be the Bulls’ gain. Probably my favorite Bull of the Dark Ages was Reggie Theus, a flashy gunner from UNLV who was basically a thoroughbred running around with donkeys.

Trivia Question 1: In the 1977 NBA draft, the Bulls selected two players from the Atlantic Coast Conference who had played for the US Olympic basketball team in 1976. Who were they and what schools did they attend?

Trivia question brought to you by the one true team

The NBA draft in 1979 proved to be something of a bottom. The Bulls’ ineptitude had earned them the right to flip a coin with the Los Angeles Lakers for the first overall pick. The Bulls lost the flip, and the consolation prize was David Greenwood of UCLA. The Lakers took a guy named Earvin Johnson out of Michigan State. Went by the name Magic. That worked out okay for the Lakers. As the Greenwood Tree took root, in 1982 the Bulls drafted Quintin Dailey out of the University of San Francisco in Round 1. Dailey, a reasonably good player, was most memorable for his nickname, “San Quintin.” Apparently, a few months before the Bulls drafted him, Dailey had been accused of sexually assaulting a resident assistant at USF. He pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and received probation, dodging any time in the penitentiary that inspired the nickname he could not shake. Decent folk – and even some local sportswriters – pilloried the Bulls’ selection of Dailey.

Eventually, the A-Train was shipped to San Antonio and the Bulls hit “re-set” for what seemed like the 15th time in my 17 years on Earth. In the six seasons pre-Jordan, the Bulls won an average of 30 games a year – or precisely 36.7 percent of the time. On the good news front, tickets to their games could be fetched for a song. That would change.

The Little School By The El Tracks

While Chicago professional basketball was in a dismal state pre-Jordan, Chicago was home to a powerhouse college program. Coach Ray Meyer’s DePaul squad, playing initially in 5,000-seat Alumni Hall at Belden and Sheffield, proved that the public would pay attention to winning basketball. DePaul built its program largely by recruiting the suburbs. In 1974, the Demons added Proviso East’s Joe “The Godfather” Ponsetto, Thornton’s Randy Ramsey, and Hersey’s Dave Corzine to an already decent squad. The next year, the Demons added Thornton’s Curtis Watkins and a rangy guard from East Orange, N.J. named Gary Garland.  The table had been set. (Later in life, Garland, whose nickname was “The Music Man,” toured as a backup singer for his half-sister, a modestly talented gal named Whitney Houston.)

Mark Aguirre and Coach Ray Meyer

In 1979, Chicago’s own version of Michael Jordan arrived in Lincoln Park in the person of Westinghouse High’s Mark Aguirre. A 6-6 forward with hands Coach Ray once described as being as large as toilet seats, Aguirre was the best pure scorer I ever saw play college basketball. As a teenager whose dad wisely bought DePaul season tickets when Aguirre was a freshman, I worshiped Mark Aguirre. (So much so that I forgave him for being a Piston later in life.) As a freshman, Aguirre joined a veteran Demons squad and led it to the Final Four, losing to Larry Bird’s Indiana State team by two points. Between that year and 1983-84 – the six-year run-up to Jordan’s arrival – the Demons were 153-27 (an .850 winning percentage). It’s no wonder that DePaul regularly drew crowds of more than 15,000 after moving to the Rosemont Horizon – the House that Mark Built. Meanwhile, the Bulls struggled to fill half of the lower level at the old Chicago Stadium.

After building the program largely with suburban kids, Meyer turned to the Chicago Public League to take his program to the next level. In addition to Aguirre, he recruited Carver’s Terry Cummings, King’s Teddy Grubbs, and Skip Dillard and Bernard Randolph from Westinghouse. I still can hear PA announcer Jim Riebandt’s spirited introduction of DePaul’s Chicago Public League-dominated starting five … “from Chicago King …,” “from Chicago Carver …,” and of course, “from Chicago Westinghouse.  Number 24.  Mark.  Aguirre.” Still gets me pumped.

Naturally, because it was a Chicago team of my youth/adolescence, the Demons underachieved. I absorbed another memorable gut punch in March 1981. My Dad let me skip school, and he and  I climbed into his baby blue Lincoln Continental and road-tripped to watch top-ranked DePaul in (we assumed) the first two rounds of the NCAA tourney in Dayton, Ohio. Alas, in one of the biggest upsets in tournament history, DePaul lost to St. Joseph’s at the buzzer, 47-46. A completely forgettable guy named John Smith made an uncontested layup at the buzzer. Aguirre put on headphones and left the arena in tears, walking all the way back to the hotel in his uniform. His supernova college career was over just like that – he was the first overall pick in NBA draft a couple months later. My Dad and I stayed for the second game (eventual national champion Indiana dismantled Maryland), and made the 1,000-mile drive back to Chicago the next morning. Crushed.

Dave Corzine

Air Jordan Arrives

There was a bridge of sorts between that DePaul program and Michael Jordan’s Bulls in the person of Dave Corzine. Corzine turns out to have been at DePaul just prior to Aguirre’s arrival, and also on the scene when Jordan arrived. After a stellar career at DePaul, Corzine was drafted in the first round by the Washington Bullets, made his way to San Antonio, and in the summer of 1982 was traded to the Bulls along with the great Mark Olberding for the A-Train. Corzine was listed at 6-11, but in college he’d played at about 7-3 thanks to a glorious ‘fro of his own. Like a lot of the big men of his era, he was simply an outsized version of a normal human being – he wasn’t the chiseled, super-hero that we see today. Consummate pro, played his 25 minutes and scored his 10 points. Set solid screens, leaned on opposing centers. Nice little mid-range jump shot. In the two years before Jordan arrived in 1984, Corzine scored 14 and 12.2 points per game – his best marks as a pro. He was part of the core of the train wreck of a squad Jordan joined.

That Jordan arrived in Chicago at all is a story often told, and already told in The Last Dance. Corzine and Co. were bad enough that the Bulls earned the third overall pick. The Rockets and Trail Blazers, in need of big men, selected Houston’s Hakeem Olajuwon and Kentucky’s Sam Bowie. Jordan fell into the Bulls’ lap, and the rest is history.

There’s no point to me walking through Jordan’s career, but there were two seminal moments for me.  As The Last Dance detailed, Jordan scored 63 points in a playoff loss to the Boston Celtics in 1986 after missing most of the season with a broken foot. I remember the game vividly, because it marked my return to being a sports fan, after a long period during which it seemed like every game I watched was a game I covered as a college journalist. I remember sitting on a couch and enjoying a ridiculous display by Jordan. He relentlessly loped around the court like a colt, contorted himself to score over, under, and around the great Celtics front line. That was the day I thought to myself, this guy is really something special. And I pinched myself – he actually plays for my team.

Trivia Question 2 – Which Bulls’ player threw the inbounds pass to Michael Jordan that led to The Shot, and where did he play in college?

trivia question brought to you by the one true team

The second MJ moment, for me, was The Shot – the dagger of a buzzer-beating jumper in  the deciding Game 5 of the first round in 1989 playoffs. Of course, Jordan hit that shot over Craig Ehlo to give the Bulls a 101-100 win, leaped about 14 feet into the air, and pumped his fist wildly as his teammates mobbed him and the Cleveland fans stood in silence. That was the first inkling that Jordan could not only shine spectacularly as an individual, but that he could will a team to win.

Move Over, Al Capone

By the time the 1990s rolled around, and certainly by the time of the 1997-98 season on which The Last Dance is focused, any Chicagoan traveling just about anywhere on Earth was almost certain to get something like this, in one accent or another:  “You’re from Chicago? Ahhhh – Michael Jordan!!”  By anywhere on Earth, I mean Europe, Asia, even Alabama or New Mexico. Jordan had become an international icon. If you were from Chicago, Jordanphiles from everywhere – and obviously, there were lots – envied you merely because you happened to live where Jordan played. “Chicago” no longer conjured up images of Prohibition era gangsters and the rat-tat-tat of their machine guns, but of the most dynamic, graceful, dominant athlete in the world.

Arriving on the heels of the Dark Ages of Bulls’ basketball, Jordan elevated the franchise to heights no one could have imagined. Wildest dreams? Nope – way, way beyond our wildest dreams. Remember, this was the franchise of Coby Dietrick and Ricky Sobers and Tom Boerwinkle. Of Granville Waiters and Leon Benbow and Sedale Threatt. Fine fellows and excellent ballers, for sure – but players who played on teams for whom the playoffs were an inconvenient and unwelcome delay from the start of the summer.

Not only did he lift the franchise, but Jordan lifted an entire population’s self-esteem. That he came, in a short time, to symbolize and represent all that was good about Chicago is a little bit ironic. After all, Jordan was from Wilmington, North Carolina. Though Jordan played in Chicago, became famous in Chicago, opened restaurants in Chicago, and raised his first family in Chicago, Jordan was not from Chicago. Jordan was not Aguirre, or Cummings, or Isiah Thomas, or Doc Rivers. They were from Chicago (or, in Rivers’ case, Maywood). MJ just played here because Portland had to have Sam Bowie and his brittle legs. As it turned out, MJ was better at basketball than all of them. And he put their town on his back and took all of us for an unforgettable ride.

Six times

Chicago’s reaction when Jordan left was interesting – a collective shrug. We didn’t really care that he found it necessary to come out of retirement and putter around with the Wizards for a couple of  years. I could not have cared less. Jordan was mine when he was at his greatest. His career ended, as far as I am concerned, with the pose in Utah after nudging Bryon Russell – ever so slightly – to free himself for a jumper that sealed a sixth title. (I have a feeling we’ll see that shot at some point in The Last Dance.) I was not the least bit bitter when Jordan decided to play for a team other than the Bulls. He’d earned the right to do whatever he wanted. I hardly watched, not because it bothered me, but because our time together had ended. I don’t even recall being very upset that the dynasty was (maybe) ushered to an early end by Bulls’ management, personified in the series as GM/Punching Bag Jerry Krause. Let’s face it, Pippen needed to get paid. Phil’s Zen act was wearing a little thin. MJ was not getting younger. And the two ends of Dennis Rodman’s candle were converging. Did the team have the right to lose its title on the court? That can be argued. But I, for one, felt satisfied with the double three-peat.

I have never met Michael Jordan in person, or been anywhere closer to him than in the same arena on the few occasions I was able to see him perform. I share very little in common with him – apart from a love of basketball, golf, and (to a lesser extent I think) casinos. But somehow, for some odd reason, I felt entitled to take more than a small measure of pride in the simple fact that he and I – and millions of others – shared a city.

A Missed Step, Or A Lost Cause?

Thankfully, The Last Dance – and not the Tiger King – will be the Covid-19 series I’ll remember best. Like any documentary that covers a lot of ground, viewers will quibble with things left out. My point is this:  the producers have missed (so far, at least) capturing Jordan’s impact on my hometown, Chicago. And they’ve missed deeply exploring the impact he had on civic pride and a city’s self-esteem. When Jordan arrived in 1984, the last championship any Chicago team had won was in 1963, when the Bears won the NFL title. The Bears would win a Super Bowl before MJ would get the Bulls to the promised land, but Jordan was the best thing that ever happened to Chicago sports, with apologies to many who were great – but not as great.

There are bits and pieces of The Last Dance that convey the Dark Ages of Bulls’ basketball, and even the footage of Jordan’s rookie season shows an ocean of empty seats at the Stadium. We heard Michael dish about the cocaine, booze, and women his teammates soaked up on road trips when he was a rookie. We’ve seen plenty of footage of parades and celebrations and adoring crowds – and we’ll see more as the series unfolds.

But what the producers missed is something that is not easily captured and communicated:  the story of how a singular athlete lifted up not just a teammate, or a team, or an entire franchise – but changed the perception and self-image of an entire city.

He is the greatest player of all time. He is maybe the most ruthless competitor to ever wear sneakers. He is a marketing force. He is a cultural icon. He’s all of the things that
The Last Dance
highlights. But during the years that really mattered – during that glorious span of 14 years – he was all ours.

-30-

Answers to Trivia Questions: 

Q1: In 1977, the Bulls selected Duke’s Tate Armstrong in the first round, and Maryland’s Steve Sheppard in the second. Both played on the gold-medal winning 1976 U.S. Olympic team. Seven of the 12 players on that team were from the ACC. 

Q2: Brad Sellers of Ohio State inbounded the ball. The highlight of his career.

answers provided by the one true team

Two of a Kind, Part 2

This is the second of two companion posts.

Even before I started to write this post, I got blowback. Tough crowd, but at least someone is paying attention.

The argument:  “Duncan Keith and Marian Hossa are not role players – they are freaking Hall of Fame talents! You cannot re-define ‘role player’ to suit your own purposes.”  Fair argument (but I kind of can re-define the term, it’s my blog).

Here’s my point in singling out the 2009-2010 Blackhawks: they were exceptional because Duncan Keith and Marian Hossa selflessly played their roles better than anyone else in the game at that time. Sure, hockey jargon is full of names for role players: sniper, creator, two-way center, stand-up defenseman, fourth-line grinder, and enforcer, to name a few. Duncan Keith was really none of those things.  He was a puck-possessing, rush-stopping defenseman. Nor do any of those descriptions do justice to Hossa: let’s call him a dogged, puck-retrieving two-way forward. But before I defend my take on the players, let me talk about the team.

The Blackhawks

Again, Covid-19 provided me an opportunity to re-watch several 2010 playoff games and inspired my decision to feature this team here. Yay Covid-19, I guess. Then I did some research. (Author’s Note: if Hockey Reference or Baseball Reference or Basketball Reference had existed when I was a child, I may never have gone to school. I had playing cards and Sports Illustrated, that’s about it.) The 2009-2010 Blackhawks finished the regular season with 112 points, second in the Western Conference (to San Jose) and third overall (to the league-leading Capitals, who got bounced in Round 1 by the Canadiens).

The Hawks then dispatched the Predators in six (more on that later), the Sharks in four, the Sedin Sisters in six, and the Flyers, of course, in six, to win the franchise’s first Stanley Cup since 1961 – a 49-year wait.

A couple of things stand out when you dig in to Hockey Reference.  First, the balance. Offensively, third out of 30 teams.  Defensively, fifth out of 30.  Six guys who scored at least 20 goals, none of whom scored more than 30.  (Kane 30, Toews 25, Sharp 25, Hossa 24, Brouwer 22, Versteeg 20.) Second, the youth. My guys Hossa (31) and Keith (26) were basically old men on this team. Of the 31 guys who played for the Hawks during the regular season, John Madden was the oldest at 36 and Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews the youngest at 21. But here’s the kicker:  24 of the 31 players were 28 or younger, and 14 were 24 or younger. That’s bonkers, and it’s the answer to the meatheads’ favorite question:  “why in da hell didn’t we keep Ladd, and Byfuglien, and Bolland, and Brouwer?”  (And later, Panarin, Teravainen, and Leddy.) The answer is really painfully simple:  You can’t keep together a group of players who achieve so much at a young age. In the hard-cap NHL, players who achieve success early in their careers become too expensive to keep.  If you have four or five to re-sign, you’re good. But you cannot resign 12 guys. You pick your horses and ride – and the horses the Hawks rode to two more Cups were prrrrrretty, prrrrrretty good nags.

The first game I re-watched recently is one that is on my personal Top 5 All-Time Sporting Events Attended In Person list (no spoilers on the other four, I see a blog post in the future here). Game 5 of Round 1, at the United Center. The Hawks were tied in the series 2-2, and down by a goal to Nashville late in the third period. With the goalie pulled, Hossa draws a five-minute major for boarding behind the Predators net – very uncharacteristic of him to take a bad penalty. Depression sets in. Then Kane miraculously ties it (kind of) shorthanded in the last minute, Hossa does his time in the sin bin into the overtime period, skates out of the box directly to the side of the Preds’ net, collects a wayward/deflected shot and buries one into a near-empty net. Big Hoss slides on his knees at the near boards, the bench empties and piles on top of him, pandemonium ensues.

That win was the springboard to the Cup. People forget how close the Hawks were to a first-round exit. Nashville was good, and being forced to win Games 6 and 7 was not something the Hawks relished. Alas, Kane and Hossa saved the day. The Hawks went on to eliminate the Sharks in four and Sedins in six, and they closed the deal on the road in Game Six in Philadelphia.

OK, so you’re up to speed. But what was so great about this Hawks team – they did win a couple more, right? Well, I suppose part of me is a sucker for the fact that the 2010 team was the first to raise a Stanley Cup banner in nearly 50 years. But I was also struck by the comparisons to the 1996 Bulls in this way: the response to “remember that 72-win Bulls team?” absolutely has the names “Michael” and “Jordan” in the answer. And, especially after their dominant playoff performances, “Toews and Kane” will roll off the tongues of most casual fans when asked about the 2010 Blackhawks. But just as Scottie Pippen and Dennis Rodman played an enormous part in that Bulls team’s success, it’s hard to imagine the Blackhawks raising the Cup without Big Hoss and Duncs. The ultimate role players. (Ducking.)

 Picture by HockeyBroad/Cheryl Adams

#2 and #81

My singling out Keith and Hossa as ultimate role players should not be taken as some sign of disrespect. They are two of my three favorite Blackhawks of all time, and both should enter the hockey Hall of Fame someday. If your definition of “role player” is the “journeyman, limited minutes, limited skill set,” then there are a gaggle of 2010 Blackhawks you would call role players without catching flak. Names like Madden and Sopel and Eager and Fraser come to mind. But that’s not Keith and Hossa.

The Blackhawks in 2009-2010 – and really throughout the Stanley Cup run – thrived on puck possession. They routinely got out-hit and didn’t much care. (Which made it especially fun when the meathead sitting a few rows down would yell at the top of his lungs for Patrick Kane to “hit someone!!” and would implore Brent Seabrook loudly to “Shooooot!” from the point on the power play notwithstanding the fact that four sets of shin guards separated him from the goal.)

For a team valuing puck possession, it was critical to have guys who were incredibly skilled at (a) moving the puck from the Hawks zone to the offensive zone, and (b) retrieving the puck if the other team had the audacity to possess it. I give you Exhibits A and B, Keith and Hossa. I like to think of hockey players having a radius of impact when they are on the ice – a measure of their ability to impact plays when the puck is within a certain distance. To my eye – and I have no advanced metrics to back this up – Keith and Hossa impacted the game seemingly whenever the puck was anyhere in the same zip code. Harvey Keitel’s character in Pulp Fiction was The Wolf – the guy who cleaned up the messes. I don’t know why it popped into my head, but I think The Wolf is a pretty good comp for Keith and Hossa – they cleaned up messes, and made things right. And got the puck back where it belonged – in the other team’s zone.

Trivia.  In 2009-2010, the Blackhawks had two US-born players who played all 104 games (82 regular season, 22 playoffs). One led the team in regular season goals and the other tied Patrick Sharp for the team lead in playoff goals. Who were the two Americans, and where were they born?

TRIVIA QUESTION BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE ONE TRUE TEAM

Duncan Keith won the Norris Trophy as the league’s top defenseman in 2010 – another nice point for those wanting to ridicule a guy who labels him a “role player.” He was second on the team in scoring with 69 points (14G, 55A). So, yeah, he could play. What Keith did better than anyone else that year, and maybe anyone I have ever seen – is possess the puck. On the defensive end, his insanely active stick was his weapon. He is not a hulking presence like Chara or Pronger. But come within a stick’s distance of Keith on the rush, and the puck was probably being knocked off your stick. And 26-year-old Keith’s speed and skating ability seemingly allowed him to always take away your “time and space” (as Eddie Olczyk would say). Once the puck was on his blade, it was leaving the Hawks zone. He’d skate it, or pass it – whatever it took. And let’s not forget this morsel: in the regular season Keith played 26:36 a night, and in the playoffs a ridiculous 28:11. Imagine how demoralizing it must have been for opposing coaches to look up and see him on the ice so damn much – kind of like when you are coaching youth basketball and the jackass coach of the other team has his star 10-year-old play every second and take 47 shots. Duncan Keith played several roles, but the role he played better than anyone else was Chief of Puck Possession.

Marian Hossa only played 57 games in the regular season, and still managed 51 points (24G, 27A). Not shabby. At times, he was a highlight reel. (If you follow that link, I recommend the “catch and release” clip.) But what I loved most about Marian Hossa – and what the Blackhawks sorely missed most about him when he stepped away – was his work as a back-checking, puck retrieving forward. To call him dogged defensively doesn’t do him justice. I wish I had a reel of highlights like this: (a) Hossa carries the puck at center ice or in the offensive zone in traffic, (b) the puck comes loose and an opponent seizes the puck and starts the other way, and (c) Hossa stops on a dime (no lazy circling around) or makes a tight turn and chases the puck-carrier as if the guy had taken his passport two minutes before Hossa’s honeymoon flight was boarding. I saw this play out literally hundreds of times, but they don’t turn plays like that into highlight reels. There was no one in the game who did this better, and I know because my eyes were glued on Big Hoss on every shift. Sure, Hossa won three Cups, made five All-Star teams, and has a ridiculously long Wikipedia page, but the fact that he never won a Selke Trophy as the league’s best defensive forward is a criminal omission. Again, for the Three Cup Blackhawks puck possession was everything. Marian Hossa did it all – but the role he played best was Chief of Puck Retrieval. If you want to possess something, and you don’t have it, you go get it. That was Marian Hossa.

Argue it. Debate it. Disagree. Whatever. That’s part of being a sports fan. But give me this: the “old men” on the 2009-2010 Blackhawks wearing sweaters #2 and #81 made them champions, because they made sure the Blackhawks had the puck more than the guys on the other side.

 Trivia Answer:  Buffalo’s Patrick Kane led the Hawks with 30 goals in the regular season; Roseau, Minnesota’s Dustin Byfuglien tied Sharp with 11 goals in the playoffs.

trivia answer brought to you by the one true team

Two of a Kind, Part 1

This is the first of two companion posts.

They were two Chicago teams in different sports, separated by 14 years and a turn of a century. They shared a city and an arena. They both won championships – one in the middle of Chicago’s greatest basketball decade, and one at the start of the city’s greatest hockey decade. One did it with the greatest basketball player of all time (apologies to no one) and a precision-fit supporting cast; the other with a roster so young that playoff beards – for many – were just rumors.

Sporadic joy. That is all I ask in return for my investment as a fan. The 1995-1996 Chicago Bulls and 2009-2010 Chicago Blackhawks are unrivaled in delivering me joy. What set those teams apart was something that sets iconic teams apart in all sports: a great player or two complemented by the complete buy-in and acceptance of roles by his or her teammates. Basketball and hockey are all about flow and momentum. Games are fluid and decisions are made on the fly, without much real-time guidance from coaches. In each sport, five players (setting aside the hockey goalie) need to act singularly.  While set plays and individual battles exist in all sports, basketball and hockey lack football’s role-defining play-calling and the hyper-importance of baseball’s pitcher/batter duel.

These two teams were athletic orchestras – one on hardwood and one on ice. They brought me joy and achieved greatness in large part because of brilliant performances by role players. Not just any role players – arguably the greatest role players I have ever seen, role players who also happen to have had Hall of Fame-caliber careers: Scottie Pippen and Dennis Rodman of the Bulls, and Marian Hossa and Duncan Keith of the Blackhawks.

I know, I know. I hear you already.  “Wait a second! How can you say Pippen and Rodman and Hossa and Keith were role players? That’s crazy.” And, “What about the 1985 Bears and 2016 Cubs and 2005 White Sox? Didn’t they bring you joy?”

Let me answer the second question first. Of course, those teams brought me joy. The 1985 Bears were a supernova; they fielded the best defense I have ever seen and an unrivaled collection of characters. That was a special group, and they did what they had been assembled to do – pummel everyone standing in the way. I don’t begrudge anyone who places the 1985 Bears on a pedestal. But I would feel a lot better about that team had it climbed the mountain at least once more. And I have grown a tad tired of the canonization of all things ’85 Bearsssss, including the head coach. You can try, but I am not sure you can convince me that Mayor Harold Washington would not have led the 1985 Bears to their Super Bowl win — as long as Buddy Ryan was left alone. The defense was that good. I mean, did you watch the playoffs?

As for the baseball teams? Special, obviously. The 2016 Game 7 Cubs’ win will likely never be displaced as the most cathartic, soul-cleansing win by any team I’ll ever follow. And while I am in the minority of Chicago fans who defend being a fan of both baseball teams (“why not?” is my argument), I am not a White Sox diehard and won’t pretend it was important to me as it was to others.

The Bulls

By 1996, the Bulls had already won three titles – during the Michael Jordan-Scottie Pippen-Horace Grant half of the dynasty. You know the story: Jordan retired in 1993 after the tragic murder of his father, dabbled in baseball, and then came back late in the 1994-1995 season wearing a strange new number (45) and a lot of rust. The Bulls bowed to the Magic in the playoffs.

The 1995-1996 season was MJ’s first full season post-(first) retirement. He had apparently shaken off that rust. The Bulls set a since-eclipsed NBA record with 72 wins. They won the NBA title after a 15-3 playoff run that included sweeps of the Heat and Magic. During the regular season, they led the league in scoring, allowed the third fewest points per game, were first in offensive efficiency, and first in defensive efficiency.

Trivia Question: Four Bulls on the 1995-96 playoff roster were born outside the USA. Name them. Answer later.

trivia Question courtesy of the one true team, three-time champion of the st. giles men’s society sports trivia night

MJ was, well, MJ. He essentially picked up where he’d left off in 1993. But what elevated the 1995-96 Bulls to be the best of the six Bulls’ champions of the Nineties was Jordan’s supporting cast. Pippen was, of course, arguably the best wing man ever. He finished the season second on the team in per game scoring (19.4), third in rebounds (6.4), first in assists (5.9), and second in steals (1.7). Thanks to a little pandemic downtime, I recently watched some of the 1996 Bulls’ playoff games. MJ was, well, MJ. A cold-blooded killer. Unstoppable offensively. Relentless defensively. A force, just as I had remembered. You don’t forget Michael Jordan.

What I had forgotten – a little bit – was Scottie Pippen’s grace and greatness. Imagine yourself pouring a few tablespoons of cooking oil into a frying pan. The oil glides across the surface in all directions, eventually covering every square inch of the pan. That was Scottie Pippen on the basketball court. Gliding effortlessly, everywhere. Covering every inch of the court with his impossibly long, loping strides. Defensively, he was always in the other team’s way – either on the ball, or in a passing lane. Offensively, he deferred to Jordan quite a lot – but somehow still made his presence known. Bouncy, spectacular, versatile. On both ends, he seemed to have the length of someone 6-11, and the mobility of someone a foot shorter. 

That Jerry Krause-built team had only three guys average in double figures — Jordan, Pippen, and The Waiter, Toni Kukoc. Steve Kerr came off the bench and was the fifth-leading scorer (8.4). Krause assembled the perfect set of complementary players for Jordan – in addition to Pippen, the team featured a collection of relatively young/relatively unproven guys (Kukoc, Luc Longley, Jason Caffey, Dickey Simpkins), mid-career journeymen keenly aware of their limitations (Kerr, Bill Wennington, Jud Buechler, Randy Brown), guys on the back nine of their careers who gladly fell in line with however the coaching staff and Jordan wanted them deployed (Ron Harper, John “Spider” Salley, James “Buddha” Edwards), and one towel-waving cheerleader (Jack Haley).

Did you notice the guy I did not mention? Dennis Rodman. He really does not fit into any of those categories. Imagine, Dennis Rodman, Non-Conformist. By then, he was not a kid, but also not yet done.  He was Dennis Rodman, rebounding savant. And he had an exceptional basketball IQ.  “You’re saying Rodman was smart?” Uh – yeah. Watch one of those playoff games in 1996. When he joined the Bulls, Rodman essentially stopped shooting – he took on average less than five shots per game in the regular season. That’s an insanely low number, considering he averaged nearly 15 rebounds a game, with 5.6 per game coming on the offensive end. Rodman would often pass up on put-back attempts after gathering a rebound – hurrying the ball back to Jordan or Pippen on the perimeter as if he was allergic to leather. What he did was played the exact role the post-Horace Grant Bulls needed – rebounding machine. His positioning on both ends of the court, awareness of spacing, anticipation of where the ball was going, knack for setting screens – all off-the-charts good. Sure, he could be a goofball and draw a technical foul or ejection occasionally, but when he bought in to what the Bulls were doing and followed Jordan and Pippen’s lead, the Bulls went from being the best team in the league to arguably the best team in history.

So beat me up if you want – tell me Scottie Pippen and Dennis Rodman were not role players. But hear me out first. A role player, to me, is not simply a John Salley or Jud Buechler – someone who mostly sits on the bench and plays a few minutes a game as a backup, often in garbage time, or as a last resort if someone is injured or in foul trouble. A role player in basketball is anyone who clearly does less than his talents allow him to do, who sacrifices for the sake of the team.  Next to Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen was always going to play second fiddle. Next to Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen, Dennis Rodman was always going to be the non-scorer, counted on to do everything else – and especially to get them the damn ball back when someone missed a shot.

As great as Jordan was, the first several years of his career proved he could not win championships on his own. For the sake of his legacy, he was lucky to have played alongside Pippen and Rodman and the many others who bent to his will and played supporting roles. Jordan was known to be a gambler. In playing with Pippen and Rodman in 1996, he drew pocket aces.

Trivia Answer: Bill Wennington (Canada), Luc Longley (Australia), Toni Kukoc (Croatia) and … get this one … Steve Kerr (Lebanon).  (Kerr’s father, Malcolm, was President at the American University in Beirut. Malcolm Kerr was murdered when Steve Kerr was in college at the University of Arizona.)

trivia answer courtesy of the one true team

© 2025 The Sandbox

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑